Stop the Pension Tax Grab

by David Wedge

Stop the Pension Tax Grab

by David Wedge
David Wedge
Case Owner
Private sector worker with a Defined Contribution pension, crowdfunding a legal opinion to challenge retrospective tax changes by the Labour government that could affect millions of ordinary savers.
28
days to go
£235
pledged of £15,000 target from 6 pledges
Pledge now
David Wedge
Case Owner
Private sector worker with a Defined Contribution pension, crowdfunding a legal opinion to challenge retrospective tax changes by the Labour government that could affect millions of ordinary savers.
Pledge now

Your card will only be charged if the case meets its target of £15,000 by Jun. 19, 2025, 9 a.m.

Latest: May 20, 2025

Legal Advice Update — Use of KC Opinion

Hi everyone — a quick update, and thank you again for your incredible support so far.

We’ve had further legal advice from Sharpe Pritchard LLP, who are supporting the case. They’ve a…

Read more

Who am I? I’m a private sector worker with a Defined Contribution pension — like millions of others across the UK. I’m not a lawyer or a politician. Just someone who believes the government shouldn’t be allowed to change the tax rules retrospectively on money we saved in good faith.

Summary This campaign will fund a formal King’s Counsel (KC) legal opinion on whether Labour’s plan to apply inheritance tax retrospectively to Defined Contribution pensions — including SIPPs — is legally challengeable. We believe it may breach property rights and the principle of legitimate expectation.

You played by the rules for the last decade. Now Labour wants to change them — retrospectively.

Call to action We are raising £15,000 to commission a leading tax and constitutional KC to test the legality of Labour’s retrospective pension tax plan.

We need your support: please contribute and share this page now to help hold the government to account.

What are we trying to achieve? If this policy goes unchallenged, it sets a dangerous precedent: that settled financial guidance can be reversed with retrospective effect. 

This isn’t just about pensions — it’s about whether the State can move the financial goalposts a decade after the fact.

A KC opinion could be the foundation for public pressure, media exposure, and legal action.

What is the next step in the case? With funds raised, we will instruct a senior KC to provide a formal written opinion on the legal risks of Labour’s retrospective tax proposal. This will guide our legal strategy and inform confidential briefings with political and media stakeholders. While the opinion itself will not be published (to preserve legal privilege and avoid revealing potential weaknesses), its conclusions will help shape our campaign messaging and response.

How much we are raising and why? We are raising £15,000, which will cover the professional fee for a leading KC specialising in taxation and public law. The opinion will assess whether the policy violates legal norms around fairness, property rights, and retrospective legislation.

Any surplus will be used to support further legal action or refunded proportionally under CrowdJustice policy.

Thank you for supporting this campaign. Whether you donate, share, or simply raise awareness, you're helping defend fairness, accountability, and the right to plan for the future — free from retrospective confiscation by government.

Because let’s be clear: Labour’s proposal is theft.

Follow campaign updates on X: @ihtonpensions

Recent contributions

Be a promoter

Your share on Facebook could raise £26 for the case

I'll share on Facebook
Update 1

David Wedge

May 20, 2025

Legal Advice Update — Use of KC Opinion

Hi everyone — a quick update, and thank you again for your incredible support so far.

We’ve had further legal advice from Sharpe Pritchard LLP, who are supporting the case. They’ve advised that it would be unwise to publish the senior KC’s opinion in full, as it will contain both the legal strengths and possible weaknesses of our challenge. Publishing it could risk undermining our position — and potentially assist the other side.

We’ll therefore be asking CrowdJustice to amend the campaign text shortly. The opinion will still be central to shaping our legal strategy, and we’ll continue to draw on it for media and political engagement — but it won’t be released in full.

This is standard practice in legal matters of this kind, and I wanted to be transparent with all of you from the outset.

Thanks again — more soon!

Warm regards,

David


    There are no public comments on this case page.