Rethink Canada Water Masterplan

by Canada Water Master Plan Challenge – local residents and stakeholders group

Rethink Canada Water Masterplan

by Canada Water Master Plan Challenge – local residents and stakeholders group
Canada Water Master Plan Challenge – local residents and stakeholders group
Case Owner
We are a forum of seven local stakeholder groups with representatives from Friends of Stave Hill, Friends of Russia Dock Woodlands, parents and school governors, and local residents/tenants groups.
2
days to go
£15,252
pledged of £30,000 stretch target from 249 pledges
Pledge now
Canada Water Master Plan Challenge – local residents and stakeholders group
Case Owner
We are a forum of seven local stakeholder groups with representatives from Friends of Stave Hill, Friends of Russia Dock Woodlands, parents and school governors, and local residents/tenants groups.
Pledge now

This case is raising funds for its stretch target. Your pledge will be collected within the next 24-48 hours (and it only takes two minutes to pledge!)

Latest: July 7, 2020

Judicial Review has been lodged!

Covid-19 has shown us all how important it is for people to have access to natural space, and particularly public open space, because not everyone is lucky enough to have a garden or balcony of their…

Read more

We are a group of local residents, community groups and organisations. Please support us in our challenge to over-development at Canada Water until the following key issues have been resolved :

Housing Segregation, Transport, Density, & Environmental Impact

About our case 

Canada Water - support our challenge to the Masterplan development. Help us reverse the decision to grant this seemingly flawed application.

London is growing – more housing is needed, as well as work space and job opportunities. As a forum of local residents and community groups, we support planned, consultative and sustainable development. For over 10 years, we have worked with developers to agree outcomes which benefit the community and have minimal impact on surrounding greenspace. We are passionate about local consultation and the importance of sustainable development. We challenge “cut and paste” development which gives no thought to the local community and its environs.

We are not completely opposed to the CWM, but strongly believe that the plan, as approved by Southwark Council in October 2019, is seriously deficient in four major areas:

  • it segregates social housing from private housing, and puts the social housing outside the main development, furthest away from the shopping areas and transport links. This segregation is in conflict with the Mayor’s London Plan, policy 3.9, para 3.58. This states that “The Mayor is concerned that there should be no segregation of London’s population by housing tenure.”
  • it will put an impossible strain on public transport, already operating at capacity as peak times. We believe that there needs to be more thought given to transport infrastructure. A new entrance to Surrey Quays station and an additional two trains per hour will not solve our transport problems.
  • it is a gross overdevelopment – from seven towers in the centre, each far taller than the one by the Canada Water bus-station, to a small site on the edge marked down for 28 flats in the local Area Action Plan, which is now to have 79 flats.
  • it will have a grievous impact on residential and other neighbours. The shading impact on residential blocks has not been sufficiently considered, nor has there been a full environmental impact assessment with regard to the adjacent Local Nature Reserve.

We are also troubled by the propriety of Southwark giving planning permission when it is in a 20/80 partnership with the developer.

The scheme still has to come before the Mayor. To make our case we need money. We have already incurred costs of £3,000. To make a legal pitch to the Mayor we need to raise a further £7,000. Our initial funding target  is £10,000.

If we have to make a case for going to court for Judicial Review, we shall need a further £20,000. We undertake that any unspent money, and any costs awarded in court, will be distributed to local SE16 community charities. These will NOT include any organisations involved in this crowd-funding initiative.

We want a new shopping and town centre along with housing provision that serves the community, not a high-rise “destination” to compete with Canary Wharf. Please give us your support. Thank you. 

Please give us your supportThank you

Recent contributions

Be a promoter

Your share on Facebook could raise £26 for the case

I'll share on Facebook
Update 2

Canada Water Master Plan Challenge – local residents and stakeholders group

July 7, 2020

Judicial Review has been lodged!

Covid-19 has shown us all how important it is for people to have access to natural space, and particularly public open space, because not everyone is lucky enough to have a garden or balcony of their own.

Rotherhithe’s accredited and much loved Local Nature Reserves are in danger from nearby overdevelopment.  

Similar schemes threaten towns and cities across the country. Over-tall buildings, blocking light, generating light spillage and funnelling wind, with long term consequences on wildlife and people. The loss of cherished views which connect us to our green spaces. The disappearance of wildlife that we take for granted. The long term impact on shaded soils.

All of this is about to happen in Rotherhithe, SE16.

Russia Dock Woodland and Stave Hill Ecology Park are two Local Nature Reserves, treasured by the local community, visited by bird watchers, insect and wildlife specialists from far and wide, and supporting a huge range of wildlife. These two sites will face irreversible effects from overdevelopment.

Developers want to commercialise and damage our green spaces.

Southwark Council’s Canada Water Area Action Plan proposed 28 dwellings for the small K1 plot on Russia Walk, next to these accredited Local Nature Reserves.  The developers want to build 79.

The K1 plot is outside the main area of the Masterplan development, segregated and furthest away from the shopping areas and transport links. K1 is reserved for social housing. Social housing should not be segregated. We need strong communities without social exclusion.  The Government has pledged to end ‘poor doors’ – this development will create 79 ‘poor doors’.

The 5 & 6 storey K1 block is planned for the southern boundary of Stave Hill Ecology Park and Russia Dock Woodland Local Nature Reserves. It will cast a long shadow, directly affecting wildlife and the wildlife habitats.

That shadow will also fall on local schools, shading playgrounds, sports pitches and growing areas. The impact on natural habitat and green spaces will be devastating and long lasting.

Our Urban green spaces have never been so necessary. Over the last three months of the Covid-19 pandemic and lockdown, access to parks has been a lifeline for many. Contact with nature, spaces for kids, places for quiet reflection – people in towns need their urban countryside. We must defend it.

London is growing – more housing is needed, as well as work space and job opportunities. People need planned, consultative and sustainable development, which supports social integration, builds communities and protects our vital green space.

Because of these concerns, many local people across the community are supporting this challenge to the Planning Decision on the Canada Water Masterplan

A request for Judicial Review of the Planning Decision has now been lodged by a highly regarded  environmental law firm, who have been retained by a local resident.

If granted leave to proceed with the action, the legal costs will be up to £30,000, and that is our updated funding target.

Update 1

Canada Water Master Plan Challenge – local residents and stakeholders group

Feb. 21, 2020

Re-think Canada Water campaign update

Our campaign is still very active, and we would like to thank you all for your continued support. How can you help? Please email your M.P! ask why the Mayor of London did not pass Planning Application Ref: 18/AP/1604 , one of the largest in the country and changing the London landscape, to the GLA for an impartial and transparent review. And please pass on the link to everyone you think may help!

Campaign update, 20th February 2020

  • 8th January - we email Southwark Planning, requesting that we be notified when the CWMP application stage 2 review goes to the Mayor/GLA
  • 8th January – Southwark Planning acknowledges this as a valid enquiry, and states that it is hoped application will be referred to Mayor / GLA at end of January.
    They also add that the Mayor then had 14 days to consider application, whether to call it in (refuse) or ratify (approve).
    They further stated that it was most unlikely planning decision would be made before end February. They suggested we might like to ask for an update in the 2nd week of February.
  • Monday 10th February – We emailed Southwark Planning for an update on the submission of the application to the Mayor / GLA.
  • Tuesday 11th February. Southwark Planning’s response to our email of the 10th Feb. They state that they could confirm the council submitted the application at the end of January -  a specific date was not given in the email.
    In the same email, it was further stated the Mayor did in fact decide not to call in the application, but to leave determination to the council .

    WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR OUR CAMPAIGN?
    The Mayor of London has decided that Southwark Council will make the final planning decision and not the GLA. Given that they have already voted yes, they're not likely to say no at 2nd stage.

We have been told by Southwark planning that there are a number of issues regarding Section 106 funding that need to be resolved, and there will be no final decision until then. We have been told this may not be until mid-March.

WHAT'S HAPPENING NOW?

  • 11th February - we emailed Buxtons (environmental law firm), and updated them on situation.
  • 11th February - Buxtons reply, with following key points:
    - GLA website still shows application had NOT been submitted for stage 2 review.
    - We need to consider preparation for potential Judicial Review.
    - the next sensible step would be to instruct a barrister to provide advice on whether there are good grounds for Judicial Review.
  • We have now instructed Buxtons to instruct a barrister to provide advice for a judicial review.

    There are no public comments on this case page.