Protect council tenants against 350% energy price hikes

by Public Interest Law Centre

Protect council tenants against 350% energy price hikes

by Public Interest Law Centre
Public Interest Law Centre
Case Owner
Challenging unlawful state practice and systemic injustice through legal representation, strategic litigation, research and legal education since 2016.
1
day to go
£5,450
donated of £10,000 stretch target from 214 pledges
Donate now
Public Interest Law Centre
Case Owner
Challenging unlawful state practice and systemic injustice through legal representation, strategic litigation, research and legal education since 2016.

Latest: July 2, 2026

7 days left: with match funding from Law for Change!

We only have 7 days left to reach our initial target!

Law for Change have kindly agreed to match fund all donations up to £350 to get us over the line in the time we’ve got left.

Please share far and w…

Read more

In the midst of a national energy crisis, hundreds of thousands of tenants remain exposed to unfair bills. Those on communal heating systems are not protected by the Energy Price Cap, leaving them vulnerable to unregulated and unfair heating charges.

They cannot change supplier. 

Bills can be increased without any limit. 

Tenants are trapped with unaffordable costs. 

"Nobody should risk losing their home because of their energy bills. What frightens me most is that if this can happen once, it can happen again." (Kirsty)

Many council tenants face threats of eviction, with unpaid energy bills often considered rent or ‘service charge’ arrears. Thousands of tenants have been forced into an impossible choice - should they feed their family or risk losing their home?

Who is bringing this case?

Kirsty is a council tenant in the London Borough of Lambeth and a local campaigner against unfair energy costs. 

In 2023, Lambeth Council increased energy bills by 350%, forcing her to pay a staggering £4,344.60 a year for her heating and hot water. Including electricity, her total annual bill was over £5,000 - almost 2.5 times the price cap. 

Lambeth have repeatedly refused Kirsty’s request for a breakdown of how her charges are calculated. She is in effect subject to arbitrary demands for heating and hot water costs that are not governed by her tenancy agreement or any published policy.

Kirsty is charged the same for her heating, even if she never turns it on. There is nothing she can do to reduce her bills.

"I never imagined I would one day face losing my home because of my heating bills. Our communal heating costs increased around 350% in one year. The debts piled up, I went into arrears and Lambeth Council started legal proceedings to take my flat." (Kirsty)

Kirsty’s situation is not unique. 

With 66% of all heat networks owned and managed by registered social landlords, the poorest in society are disproportionally affected. Yet tenants in social housing have the least protection against unfair price hikes. 

Global events will continue to impact energy bills. Kirsty and others in her position cannot wait for another shock to their energy bills. 

Donate now to support Kirsty and other council tenants

We are raising £10,000 to challenge unfair tenancy agreements that allow landlords to increase the costs for heating and hot water without constraint and without explanation. 

"The bailiffs were on their way and the locksmith was downstairs. I was only minutes away from being made homeless. No one should have to live through something like that because of their heating bills.” (Lambeth Tenant)

What are we trying to achieve? 

We have asked the court to strike down clauses in our client's tenancy agreement, which allow the council to increase her heating and hot water charges without providing information on how charges are calculated, without explaining the circumstances which will lead to increases, and without any limit on total costs

We argue that such terms are unfair and a breach of Kirsty’s consumer rights. We also argue that they breach her rights under the Human Rights Act, in particular her peaceful enjoyment of property. 

Whilst our case is against Lambeth Council, such clauses are widespread and a success in this claim would force other councils and social housing providers to reconsider similarly unfair terms across the country. 

How much we are raising and why? 

We are raising £10,000 to protect our client against adverse costs were she to lose her case. 

We have issued an application for judicial review in the High Court. But Kirsty now needs funds to apply for a 'costs capping order'. This will limit her liability for Lambeth Council's costs if she loses her case. 

Without your support Kirsty will not be able to continue her claim. 

Where will my money go? 

All funds raised will go towards Kirsty's legal costs and to allow her challenge against these unfair and exploitative price hikes. At the end of the case, any money left over will go into a fighting fund to protect others challenging systemic injustice. 

To learn more, visit the Lambeth Tenants Heat Campaign website. Or if you’d like further information about the case, please get in touch at [email protected].

Thank you for your support and solidarity, 

PILC

Recent contributions

Update 2

Public Interest Law Centre

July 2, 2026

7 days left: with match funding from Law for Change!

We only have 7 days left to reach our initial target!

Law for Change have kindly agreed to match fund all donations up to £350 to get us over the line in the time we’ve got left.

Please share far and wide!

Thank you,

PILC

Update 1

Public Interest Law Centre

June 19, 2026

Permission Granted!

Good news! 


The court has granted permission for Kirsty’s judicial review to continue to a full hearing. 

 

We are delighted for Kirsty. But it is now more important than ever to raise the funds she needs to bring this claim. 

 

Please share this crowdfunder far and wide, so we can reach our fundraising target.


Thank you!