Latest: March 5, 2019
Thank you all from the bottom of my heart!
We've already hit our first target meaning I can get started in instructing my barrister to commence the case! I must thank you all so so so much for all the support you have given me. It is de...Read more
My name is Seb and I am a first-year student at the University of Central Lancashire (UCLAN). If you follow any alternative media sites you may have heard about my recent suspension from UCLAN for having a viewpoint that they did not agree with.
This suspension has not only prevented me from attending current classes but also a teaching work placement. This is likely to have a lasting effect on my future career and hopes of working in child protection. They said:
"It is likely to be of concern that Sebastian is on a course that could facilitate a career with children, young people and/or vulnerable adults."
Please help me save my career and make sure Universities are a place for open discussion! I need to raise at least £20,000 to fight this in court.
I have taken expert legal advice from a barrister and planning to issue a Judicial Review of The University of Central Lancashire's decision to suspend me for expressing a viewpoint that is contrary to what they consider appropriate.
Here’s what happened:
In a discussion during a class I said:
"The UK is being islamified"
"Halal meat is violent and barbaric"
"Anyone who doesn't have legal status in the UK should not be given free handouts of our services"
As a result of this, some students, including ones who were not even there, filed complaints about me. They claimed that they had been made to feel unsafe and were harassed by my words which were used in the context of a discussion.
I believe myself to be a polite and thoughtful person whose views are informed by fact and reason. I didn’t say anything criminal or threatening but I have shown well-researched concern with the fairness of the benefits system and the practice of ritual slaughter. This has led to the end of my formal education and the beginning of the end of my career in the social care sector.
Universities are supposed to be an environment where young adults can respectfully express their viewpoints and be challenged by the views of others. However, as a result of the above, I was the subject of 3 disciplinary hearings. In those hearings, I attempted to get the faculty to see my point of view but they were determined to tell me my views were unacceptable without further discussion. It was written in my report that:
"A tutor says that she has already had discussions with Sebastian about keeping his personal and political beliefs to himself and about setting appropriate boundaries"
Instead of getting a fair hearing, I was accused of harassment. They determine harassment on this following basis:
“It is not the intention of the alleged harasser that determines whether harassment has occurred, but whether it is considered unacceptable to the complainant”.
So even though I can rationally and calmly defend each point I made on the grounds of statistics and animal welfare, since some students complained, my opinion and intention is irrelevant. Furthermore, the Universities definition of harassment is not the same as the one used in the law.
Even so, the report at my second tier hearing concluded:
"It is clear to me that the students who have complained have all been offended by what Sebastian has said and that student C has experienced this as harassment. I, therefore, conclude that Sebastian has also breached regulation C1.4 and C1.9 also."
What happens next?
My barrister says I have a very strong case to pursue but I'll need intial funding to start the claim and see it through. If I am successful with the Judicial Review, I will be readmitted to the university with a cleared record but I know the fight for fair and open discussion won’t end there.
While I know this is very important to my future, it is bigger than just me. Across the country universities will continue their campaign of censorship, de-platforming and vilification. If this is allowed to stand then only one type of view will be heard: Theirs. A civilised society cannot allow its academic institutions to determine what is acceptable discourse, that is a matter for the law and the students of today are the lawmakers of tomorrow.
Freedom of speech does not and must not come with the provision that others cannot be offended by what you say. 60 years ago it was considered ‘offensive’ to suggest that women were equal! If we didn't say things that may be considered offensive to some then women wouldn't even have the vote! This is only one of many examples of progress through questioning the status quo.
Pandering to offence is a race to the bottom because no matter what you say, someone will always find offence in it. The cure to extreme views is not suppressing them, it is challenging them and discussing them.
Please help me save my education and stand up for freedom of speech when no-one else will.
I may not agree with what everyone says but I will always defend their right to say it. Please help defend mine.
Every little helps so please support me in any way you can.
March 5, 2019
Thank you all from the bottom of my heart!
We've already hit our first target meaning I can get started in instructing my barrister to commence the case! I must thank you all so so so much for all the support you have given me. It is deeply humbling to know that so many people, from around the world, feel so passionate about this cause. I now know that I stand a chance against the establishment and you are all to thank for helping the underdog in this fight!
And fight I will! I am not going to let this go until we have sent a message to all universities that we will not allow free speech to be trampled.
I'm going to be keeping this page updated with all of my progress and legal documents that are submitted for everyone to see. There is still a long way to go between now and the proceedings and I've set an ambitious stretch target but at least we have enough to get going!
If not for the people on the front lines of the culture war you all may never have even heard of me so a special thank you to Carl Benjamin (aka Sargon of Akkad) who not only promoted me on his video but also gave a very generous donation.
Thank you to each and everyone one of you, you truly are the guardians of free speech.
March 2, 2019
"1984 was supposed to be a cautionary tale, not a guidebook"
Oh my god! This appeal has bearly started and we've already raised so much! Thank you for your generosity and belief in freedom of speech. I have read every motivational comment and while what lies ahead of me seems daunting I am encouraged by the sheer amount of people who believe in this cause.
I am so grateful to everyone, regardless of where you heard about me but a special thanks has to go to Young Independence who donated a symbolic '£1984' to remind us that for George Orwell's dystopia to become a reality, good people need only do nothing.
Another big thank you to Markus Meechan (aka Count Dankula), who has helped signal boost this cause to as many of his Youtube viewers as possible. You are a hero!
If we meet the target I am going to push this all the way. Me and my legal team will make as much noise about free speech as possible so please help keep the momentum going and like and share this page to as many people as you can!
There are no public comments on this case page.