Tennessee Riverkeeper vs 3M Company

by Tennessee Riverkeeper

Tennessee Riverkeeper vs 3M Company

by Tennessee Riverkeeper
Tennessee Riverkeeper
Case Owner
The mission of Tennessee Riverkeeper is to protect the Tennessee River and its tributaries by enforcing environmental laws and educating the public. We are bringing this case to stop PFC contamination
Funded
on 11th May 2017
$3,065
pledged of $5,000 stretch target from 45 pledges
Tennessee Riverkeeper
Case Owner
The mission of Tennessee Riverkeeper is to protect the Tennessee River and its tributaries by enforcing environmental laws and educating the public. We are bringing this case to stop PFC contamination

With a major American river poisoned by toxic chemicals dumped into it by one of the nation’s largest corporations, Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc. has filed a federal lawsuit against 3M Company and other defendants under the United States Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The suit alleges the defendants’ contamination of the Tennessee River in and near Decatur, Alabama with perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and related chemicals has created an “imminent and substantial endangerment to health and the environment.” The toxins – components or byproducts of 3M’s manufacture of its profitable lines of “non-stick” products like Scotchgard and Stainmaster – have polluted the Tennessee River’s Wheeler Reservoir, a popular recreation destination and home to various important wildlife species and ecosystems. The Riverkeeper’s RCRA suit seeks to compel the immediate and thorough clean-up of the contaminants.

As even minimal exposure to PFOS and PFOA is linked to a variety of lethal health hazards, there exist virtually no safe levels of the chemicals in the environment. Research strongly indicates PFOA and PFOS are potent carcinogens, and they have also been tied to birth defects and adverse effects on childhood development, significantly decreased immune system function, liver tissue damage and a host of other serious health problems. Consequently, in a May 2016, the EPA announced Drinking Water Health Advisories for PFOA and PFOS of only 0.07 parts per billion.

However, PFOA and PFOS levels in the Tennessee River near the 3M site are, respectively, more than 70,000 and 50,000 times higher than the EPA’s safety advisory.

“We don’t mind 3M making profitable products – but, we cannot tolerate the defendants putting profit ahead of the health of people, the environment and the River,” David Whiteside, Tennessee Riverkeeper’s Founder and Executive Director, said, “Tennessee Riverkeeper members are both this River’s users and guardians,” Whiteside said. “After nearly five decades of 3M’s pollution of the Tennessee River, where no one has held the defendants accountable, we felt we needed to act to protect this precious resource and all the wildlife and restore justice to the hundreds of thousands of people who rely upon her waters everyday.”

Tennessee Riverkeeper’s RCRA suit does not seek money, but instead demands the broad based clean-up of the aforesaid contaminants.

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. added, “The rights to clean air and water and to a safe secure environment are fundamental civil rights and as with all pollution, the injuries from 3M’s pollution land hardest on the backs of Alabama’s poor and minority communities.’”

3M has produced PFOS at its Decatur plant since the early 1960s, and PFOA at the site since 1999. On-site disposal practices have resulted in groundwater contamination and the contamination of the Wheeler Reservoir of the Tennessee River. 3M has also transported waste off-site to nearby landfills. The largest volume has been delivered to the City of Decatur-Morgan County Sanitary Landfill, owned by co-Defendant City of Decatur. Waste was also transported to landfills owned and/or operated by other Defendants, like the A.J. Morris Landfill (Morris Farm Landfill), in Hillsboro, Alabama, owned by BFI Waste Systems of Alabama, LLC. Finally, waste was also received by the now closed Bert Jeffries Landfill (also called the Browns Ferry Road Site), which is now owned by 3M.

These landfills all have high levels of groundwater contamination from PFOA, PFOS and related chemicals. The chemicals are also found at high levels in the liquid waste, called leachate, collected from Morris Farms and the Decatur-Morgan County landfills. The collected leachate from both landfills is sent to the Dry Creek Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP), owned by Decatur Utilities. The plant has inadequate treatment capabilities for these chemicals and, therefore, discharges harmful amounts into the Tennessee River.

Tennessee Riverkeeper’s RCRA lawsuit seeks to compel the immediate, thorough and verifiable clean-up of all of these areas. Riverkeeper demands that 3M dramatically increase its efforts to remediate its on-site groundwater contamination, that groundwater at the landfill sites be mitigated, that leachate from the two landfills that collect leachate be treated before discharge to the Dry Creek WWTP, and that the WWTP treat its discharge to remove these chemicals before discharge to the Tennessee River. Riverkeeper further asks that 3M be held responsible for the required remediation at the off-site facilities.

“3M profited for decades off of the products it produced that polluted the Tennessee River, and now it needs to live up to its moral responsibility - and its legal obligation - to do and spend what is necessary to expeditiously eliminate the threats to human health and the environment that these contaminants cause,” said Matsikoudis & Fanciullo, a New Jersey law firm that is representing the Tennessee Riverkeeper. Mark Martin, Riverkeeper’s chief prosecuting attorney, also represents the nonprofit.

Get updates about this case

Subscribe to receive email updates from the case owner on the latest news about the case.

Be a promoter

Your share on Facebook could raise $26 for the case

I'll share on Facebook

No updates yet

Get updates about this case

Subscribe to receive email updates from the case owner on the latest news about the case.

    There are no public comments on this case page.