Help us democratically elect a Labour 2018 Mayoral candidate in Newham

by Newham Mayor Trigger Ballot Legal Challenge Campaign

Help us democratically elect a Labour 2018 Mayoral candidate in Newham

by Newham Mayor Trigger Ballot Legal Challenge Campaign
Newham Mayor Trigger Ballot Legal Challenge Campaign
A legal campaign challenging how the Labour Party's 2018 Mayoral candidate in Newham was chosen. Evidence presented to Labour's ruling body by local members calling for an inquiry was ignored.
26
days to go
£10,810
pledged of £30,000 stretch target by 201 people
Pledge now
Newham Mayor Trigger Ballot Legal Challenge Campaign
A legal campaign challenging how the Labour Party's 2018 Mayoral candidate in Newham was chosen. Evidence presented to Labour's ruling body by local members calling for an inquiry was ignored.
Pledge now

This case is raising funds for its stretch target. Your pledge will be collected within the next 24-48 hours (and it only takes two minutes to pledge!)

Thank you! We reached our first stage target and this is what happens next.

Nov. 17, 2017

Firstly,  a BIG thank you to all our supporters! We have been blown away by the amounts pledged so far, alongside the massive support our legal challenge campaign has received from you and others interested in political accountability and democracy in the Labour Party in Newham. 


Thanks to your support we have now reached our first stage fundraising target of £10,000 (and over!),...

Read More >>

We are local Labour Party members in Newham who want to get to the truth about why the national Labour Party imposed Sir Robin Wales as its candidate for Newham’s Directly Elected Mayor. We believe our rights as members of a democratic and progressive Labour Party have been disregarded by the national Party. 

Like many members and activists in Newham we believed that the Newham Trigger Ballot, which took place between October and December 2016 to decide who should be Labour’s candidate for Newham’s Directly Elected Mayor in 2018, would be run in a fair and transparent way. However, there were many irregularities and inconsistencies with the process.

A clear majority of local Party members and Party branches voted for an open selection so that they could choose from a range of candidates but they were outnumbered by the votes of Labour Party affiliate organisations.  We believe the process was flawed and the spirit and integrity of national Labour Party rules was undermined. We want a fair and open selection process to select a candidate who will unite the local Labour parties in Newham and bring about victory for Labour in May 2018.

We also want to stop this happening elsewhere in the Labour Party - especially at a time when Directly Elected Mayors have been established in places such as Manchester, Birmingham and Liverpool. This will restore faith in the party’s procedures which should be democratic, transparent and fair.




The Newham Trigger Ballot Legal Campaign was launched in January 2017 after the Labour Party's ruling body refused to launch an investigation into the 2016 Newham Trigger Ballot. Despite a majority of Newham Labour Party members who took part in the ballot voting for a democratic and open selection to choose from a diverse range of candidates for elected Mayor, their votes have been overruled.

The legal action has been launched because local Labour Party members want to expose the way in which the selection process to 're-affirm' Sir Robin Wales was marred with irregularities, lack of information, transparency and all-round confusion.

Undemocratic practices were used to swing the Trigger Ballot in Sir Robin's favour, who has been in post since 2002. In some cases, affiliated organisations who had no entitlement to vote did so. While some were encouraged to cast several votes and others to vote only once. There was shock amongst the membership, but despite appeals, petitions, lobbying and campaigning, the Labour Party ignored the issues and even the Labour Party Rule Book.


So as two members from East Ham and West Ham CLPs (party members for more than 45 years) with a large support base, we have decided to challenge the process for the sake of democratic accountability in the Labour Party, fairness and transparency (read the background and more details here and here). We are all members and supporters of the Labour Party and are only interested in pursuing this legal claim out of concern for the proper democratic functioning and integrity of the Party. 

Please help and support us. 


As the largest democratic socialist political party in Europe, it's vital that the Labour Party advances the process of democratic renewal and accountability in our country so that voters have confidence in the values of Labour politics. This must start within our Party. Already the party has announced its Party Democracy Review to look at how best to increase diversity of political representation, strengthening the involvement of its members, make politics more transparent and accessible, improve local and regional structures, harness the power of social media and make the Labour Party more engaging. But it is now ignoring existing glaring democratic failings.


There are five main grounds of the legal challenge to the 2016 Labour Party Trigger Ballot process in Newham: 

There are 5 main grounds of challenge:

1. The rules were inconsistently applied in respect of which Affiliated Organisations (AOs) could take part.

2. The rules were inconsistently explained, in that those running the Trigger Ballot (TB) failed to ensure AOs were properly informed of their voting rights and that the TB was fairly run.

3. The NEC failed to carry out a proper investigation, despite prima facie evidence of impropriety (as set out in a long letter sent to the NEC on 17 January 2017).

4. The NEC wrongly endorsed Sir Robin Wales, when there was compelling evidence that the process was flawed.

5. The rules for the 2016 Trigger Ballot in Newham were wrongly applied because some AOs were encouraged to vote more than once.


There's been extensive correspondence between our lawyers, ITN Solicitors, and the Labour Party.

We need to raise money and by donating to this legal campaign you will be supporting the following stages of our legal action:

1. Pre-action costs

2. Mediation

3. Issue  of Statement of Claim / Pleadings

4. Disclosure


To be clear, we are two long-standing Labour Party members of East Ham and West Ham CLPs. We are taking this action not because we want to sue the Labour Party or have party funds spent defending our claim. We have been advised by our lawyers that we have strong grounds for our claim and the Labour Party must know it is likely to lose. We are taking this action for the benefit of the Labour Party in Newham and to stop this happening elsewhere. We are supported by hundreds of local party members who, like us, want to ensure that in the Labour Party any democratic selection or election process is run properly, openly and fairly – and in line with its rules. 

PLEASE SUPPORT THE CAMPAIGN AND PASS THIS INFORMATION ON THROUGH ALL YOUR NETWORKS. 















Thank you! We reached our first stage target and this is what happens next.

Nov. 17, 2017

Firstly,  a BIG thank you to all our supporters! We have been blown away by the amounts pledged so far, alongside the massive support our legal challenge campaign has received from you and others interested in political accountability and democracy in the Labour Party in Newham. 


Thanks to your support we have now reached our first stage fundraising target of £10,000 (and over!), so wanted to provide you with some details of what that will cover and what will happen next: 


  1. Now the target has been reached, we have entered our 'stretch' target phase of £30,000, which reflects the second stage of our legal action if we need to proceed that far. We are hoping that we don't need to get to the second stage with the Labour Party, as over the past several months we have been urging their lawyers to resolve this matter through a binding mediation process. Unfortunately, we were unable to get them to do so which left us no alternative but pursue the matter through legal means. 
  2. If the case does go to court, their lawyers will realise that: (i) our case is very strong, (ii) disclosure to the court will cause the Party huge political embarrassment once, and (iii) the truth about what really happened during last year's Newham Trigger Ballot finally becomes public. That will highlight the many failings in the process and how local members were denied the opportunity to choose from a range of candidates in a fair Open Selection process. 
  3. In the meantime, CrowdJustice will release the money raised to our lawyer's 'Client' account. The initial amount will enable us to issue our Statement of Claim which sets out the grounds on which we believe the Labour Party has behaved improperly during Newham's Trigger Ballot last year. 
  4. This will be done by our lawyers ITN Solicitors alongside our Counsel team led by Tim Johnston from Brick Court Chambers, whose recent public law cases included the successful Miller "Article 50" litigation that forced Theresa May to get parliamentary approval for triggering Article 50.  They will finalise the Pleadings documents that will be issued to the Labour Party next week. 
  5. Once received, lawyers representing the Labour Party will have 14 days to respond. Our lawyers and Counsel will examine carefully their defence following which a 'Case Management Conference' will take place between the two legal teams. 
  6. It is at this stage, and following the assessment of the 'defence' by our lawyers and Counsel team, that we will decide how to pursue our claim. 


We will of course keep all our supporters updated over the course of the coming week, and our deepest thanks once again for supporting us in this important case. 

Democracy, fairness and political accountability in the Labour Party has to be honoured, and your support with this case is helping us achieve that for every single Labour Party member in Newham and beyond. 

    There are no public comments on this case page.